Oct 01, 2014 Minute Order re Form for 6 subclasses

This is an unofficial transcription of a scan of a court document, the original scanned document can be viewed here

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
CΕΝΤRΑL

 

MINUTE ORDER

 

DATE: 10/01/2014
TIME: 08:15:00 AM
DEPT: C-71
JUDICIAL OFFICER PRESIDING: Ronald S. Prager
CLERK: Terry Ray
REPORTER/ERM: Lois Mason Thompson CSR# 3685
BAILIFF/COURT ATTENDANT: L. Wilks

CASE NO: 37–2011-00102593-CU-OE-CTL
CASE INIT.DATE: 12/16/2011
CASE TITLE: Felczer vs. Apple Inc [IMAGED]
CASE CATEGORY: Civil – Unlimited CASE TYPE: Other employment


EVENT TYPE:
Ex Parte


EVENT TYPE:
Ex Parte


ΑΡΡΕΑRΑΝCΕS:
Tyler J Belong, counsel, present for Plaintiff(s).
Jeffrey L Hogue, counsel, present for Plaintiff(s).
Joshua D. Kienitz, counsel, present for Defendant(s).
Shea Brack, counsel, present for Defendant.


Ex-parte application for Responding To Discovery and Defendant’s Voluntary Consent Form requested by Plaintiff.

Ex-parte application for Application For Approval of Voluntary Interview Consent Form in Unrelated Matter requested by Defendant.

The Court makes the following disclosure on the record:

I was re-elected on June 3, 2014. Pursuant to California Code of Judicial Ethics 3E(2)(b) and 3E(2)(b)(ii), I am required to make this disclosure on the record.

A list of attorneys and parties who contributed to my re-election campaign is available upon request from the clerk of this department. Any attorney or individual who wishes to review the list may do so before proceeding with his or her matter.

By 10/8, counsel will work out details of form and scope of class notice for all 6 subclasses.

Plaintiff is to have form agreed upon, but to hold in abeyance until Court of Appeal rules on service pending writ.

Status Conference – on discovery to determine whether Apple will compromise to turn over only time records of putative class members, but not compensation records.

If Apple is unable to agree – court needs to know how much time is required to perform time record discovery.

Both sides agree that court may resolve discovery issues in this case as it relates to bag check case.
Apple’s counsel agree they will provide all information on interviews which they will use in Federal Court in bag check case thru Pacer System.

Apple’s counsel will not have to disclose contents of interviews they do not seek to use in Federal Court unless there is any mention of subject matter of this lawsuit including meal breaks, rest breaks, final paychecks, waiting time penalties in which case Apple will provide contact information.
Apple agrees to serve directly to plaintiff’s all federally required disclosures within the scope of this order.

Status Conference – 10/8 at 9:00 am.

The Status Conference (Civil) is scheduled for 10/08/2014 at 09:00AM before Judge Ronald S. Prager.

Signed by:
Judge Ronald S. Prager