December 7, 2016
Apple’s counsel gives closing arguments on behalf of Apple’s defense. Class counsel gives final closing arguments in rebuttal. The jury begins deliberations.
Read full transcript: December 7, 2016 – Felczer Jury Trial Transcript
Phone: 1.619.238.4720
- Home
- Practice
- Articles
- Can My Landlord Keep My Security Deposit for Any Repairs He Claims are Needed?
- Sexual Abuse of Minors
- The impact of COVID-19 on Whistleblower Lawsuits
- What the Law Says About Pregnancy Discrimination
- California Laws on Restroom Breaks
- The Call-to-Work Order and the Law
- What the ADA Means for Employed Persons with Disabilities
- Your basic rights as an employee
- Protecting your rights against workplace retaliation
- Myths and Misconceptions About Sexual Harassment and Assault
- Handling Third-Party Sexual Harassment
- The legal nuances of cell phone reimbursement claims
- How California tackles breach of warranty
- Drug and device lawsuits: Things you need to know
- Verdicts & Settlements
- $4,700,000.00 – Heather Phillips, et al. v. Dominos’ Pizza Franchises
- $2,455,000.00 – Lizbeth Garcia, et al. v. The Bay Clubs Company, LLC
- Jackie Usher & Eric Leung v. DirecTV, et. al. [$2,400,000.00]
- Jane Doe v. National Gym Chain – sexual harassment [$1,700,000.00]
- Contreras v. FHC [$5,915,645.00]
- Gonzales et al. v. Fresenius Medical Care [$6,000,000.00]
- Pearson et al. v. P.F. Chang’s. [$6,500,000.00]
- Gathright v. Cheesecake Factory [$535,861.53 ]
- 4 Female Employees v. Prison Transitional Facility [$725,000.00]
- 5 Female Plaintiffs v. National Restaurant Chain [$1,500,000.00]
- Employees v. Global Mobile Phone Provider [$2,750,000.00]
- Carralero et al. v. Sharp [$1,825,000.00]
- Andrade et al. v. P.F. Chang’s [$1,846,200.00]
- Britt et al. v. Scripps [$2,900,000.00]
- Parker v. MAC Industries, Inc., et al. [$1,009,969.48]
- Ryan et al. v. Home Depot [$4,064,369.30]
- Muldrow v. Surrex Solutions Corporation
- News
- Federal Court Approves P.F. Chang’s Payout of $6.5 Million in Class Action Settlement
- Hogue & Belong Files Class Action Alleging HP’s Illegal “No-Poach” Agreement With 3D Systems Supressed Worker Wages
- Hogue & Belong Prosecutes a Class Action Against Chipotle for Recovery of Workers’ Meal and Rest Period Premiums and other Wages
- Contreras v. Family Health Centers – H&B obtains $5.9 Million Jury Verdict
- Hogue & Belong Law Named 2017 Litigators of the Year
- CNN: Jury Finds Apples Owes $2 Million Dollars for not Giving Workers Meal Breaks
- Hogue & Belong Defeats Morgan Lewis & Scores Major Victory in Class Action against P.F Chang’s
- Contreras V. Family Health Centers of San Diego
- Hogue & Belong Scores Victory for Sexual Harassment Case against the Cheesecake Factory
- San Diego Lawsuit Alleges Age Discrimination at Hewlett – Packard
- About
- Contact