Oct 08, 2013 Minute Order Discovery Issues_Request for Compliance

 

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
CΟUΝΤΥ ΟF SΑΝ DΙΕGΟ
CENTRAL
MINUTE ORDER

 

DATE: 10/08/2013
TIME: 08:15:00 AM
DEPT: C-71

JUDICIAL OFFICER PRESIDING: Ronald S. Prager
CLERK: Lee Ryan
REPORTER/ERM: Darla Kmety CSR# 12956
BAILIFF/COURT ATTENDANT: Lynn Wilks

CASE NO: 37–2011-00102593-CU-OE-CTL
CASE INIT.DATE: 12/16/2011
CASE TITLE: Felczer vs. Apple Inc [IMAGED]
CASE CATEGORY: Civil – Unlimited
CASE TYPE. Other employment


ΕVΕΝΤ ΤΥΡΕ: Εx Ρarte


ΕVΕΝΤ ΤΥΡΕ: Εx Ρarte


ΑΡΡΕΑRΑΝCΕS
Tyler J Belong, counsel, present for Plaintiff(s).
Jeffrey L Hogue, counsel, present for Plaintiff(s).
Lara K. Strauss, Esq., specially appearing for counsel LYNN C HERMLE, present for Defendant(s).
Julie A Dunne, counsel, present for Defendant(s).


Re: Request for Compliance date by 10/11/13
If in-camera review is required, Apple may notify Court 10/28/13.
Moving papers in support 10/23/13.
Reply 10/25/13 hand delivered to Court 10/25/13 by 2:00 pm, delivered to courtroom.

Plaintiff will provide supplemental replacement discovery re: Special Interrogatory Set 2 by 10/11/13. Plaintiff confirms once that is done, plaintiff has completely complied with Court 9/6/13 order.

Court signs Amended Order granting dismissal of plaintiff’s Fifth Cause of Action With Prejudice as to named plaintiffs individual claim and without prejudice as to class claims nunc pro tunc 9/8/13.

After conferring with both sides Court approves voluntary interview consent form as modified. See Court Exhibit 1.

Court Orders up to 4 hours follow-up deposition for plaintiff to depose Apple PMQs. See Order.

Re: waiting time records

Re terminations — there are 3 subclasses and 18,000 employees (12,000 retail and 6,000 corporate). For class certification purposes, plaintiff may select up to 100 names of employees by employee number which will be produced in 2 weeks.
Apple will sign stipulated 4th Amended Complaint once all reference to Labor Code 5212 are removed.

If Apple uses consent form approved today, Court will presume (rebuttable presumption) that declarations were collected voluntarily and without Collusion. –

Signed by:
Judge Ronald S. Prager


This is an unofficial transcription of a scan of a court document, the original scanned document can be viewed here