This is an unofficial transcription of a scan of a court document, the original scanned document can be viewed here.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
BRANDON FELCZER, individually,
RYAN GOLDMAN, individually,
RAMSEY HAWKINS, individually, and
JOSEPH LANE CARCO, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,
APPLE INC., a California corporation; and DOES 1 through 300, inclusive,
Case No. 37-2011-00102593 CU-OE-CTL
ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO THE HON. RONALD S, PRAGER
ORDER RE:LIIMITED EXCEPTION FROM PROTECTIVE ORDER
Trial Date: None Set
Complaint Filed: December 16, 2011
On June 29, 2015, counsel for both parties appeared at the parties’ exparte hearing.
Based on the papers submitted, and oral argument at the hearing, the Court orders as follows:
Hogue & Belong may use the following information produced pursuant to the protective order in this case for purposes of litigating the case of Walker v. Apple Inc. case pending in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California Case No. 3:15-cy-0!147-L-BGS.
Specifically, the parties agree that the Law Firm of Hogue and Belong may use the information attached hereto as Exhibit A (Felczer final pay subclass with termination date between 4,17, 15 to 1.5.2015) and Exhibit B (Felczer final pay subclass with termination date between 4.17.12 to 1.5.2015) for use only in the Walker case,
Court takes note of Apple’s position that any data via this Court order is inadmissible in the Walker case. This Court makes no finding or order that any data obtained from this Order is or is not admissible in the Walker case inasmuch as the Court in the Walker case shall determine
admissibility or inadmissibility.
IT IS SO ORDERED
Dated: JUL – 2 2015
GREGORY W. POLIACK.
Judge of the San Diego County Superior Court